United States of America v. Hanifi
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ali A. Hanifi
Case Number: 3:2008cv00257
Filed: April 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Contract: Recovery Student Loan Office
County: Rankin
Presiding Judge: William H. Barbour
Presiding Judge: Henry T. Wingate
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 28:1345 Default of Student Loan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 12 FINAL JUDGMENT granting Ore Tenus Motion to Dismiss without prejudice suit against defendant Ali A. Hanifi. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 9/26/08 (PKM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Hanifi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Pshon Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ali A. Hanifi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?