MSSCO Contract Sales, LLC v. Jestev Casework Company
Plaintiff: MSSCO Contract Sales, LLC
Defendant: Jestev Casework Company
Case Number: 3:2008cv00287
Filed: May 6, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Contract Product Liability Office
County: Hinds
Presiding Judge: Tom S. Lee
Presiding Judge: James C. Sumner
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AGREED ORDER DISMISSING CASE: that this cause of action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 4/23/09 (SEC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MSSCO Contract Sales, LLC v. Jestev Casework Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MSSCO Contract Sales, LLC
Represented By: Richard M. Dye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jestev Casework Company
Represented By: Ronnie Leigh Walton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?