Alexander v. Textron Financial Corporation
Plaintiff: Charles C. Alexander, III
Defendant: Textron Financial Corporation
Case Number: 3:2008cv00553
Filed: September 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Daniel P. Jordan
Presiding Judge: James C. Sumner
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1442 Notice of Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Summary Judgment. A judgment will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on January 26, 2009. (SP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alexander v. Textron Financial Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles C. Alexander, III
Represented By: Joseph Patrick Frascogna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Textron Financial Corporation
Represented By: William C. Brabec
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?