Jones v. Stuart C. Irby Company
Plaintiff: Nancy Jones
Defendant: Stuart C. Irby Company
Case Number: 3:2008cv00603
Filed: September 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Hinds
Presiding Judge: Daniel P. Jordan
Presiding Judge: James C. Sumner
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting 21 Motion for Summary Judgment as set out in the order. A judgment will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on October 14, 2009. (SP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Stuart C. Irby Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Jones
Represented By: Ermea J. Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stuart C. Irby Company
Represented By: Tori L. Winfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?