Luster v. Beckham et al
| Tony O'Neil Luster |
| James Beckham and Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility |
| 3:2009cv00214 |
| April 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Hinds |
| Linda R. Anderson |
| Henry T. Wingate |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant James Beckham's motion for summary judgment 21 and supplement to motion for summary judgment 24 are granted. Final judgment is entered in favor of defendant Beckham. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 6/21/2010 (SM)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER: Plaintiff within 20 days of the date of this order shall provide this Court with the civil action number of every civil action or appeal which the Plaintiff has had dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious or fails to state a c laim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff shall also provide the name of the Court and name(s) of Defendant(s)in each civil action identified. Clerk is directed to issue summons to defendant James Beckham, with the U. S. Marshal to serve same, and the defendant is required to file a response to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 7/20/09 (PKM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
