Lee v. Ishee et al
| James Edward Lee |
| Patty Ishee and Barbara Ravenhorst |
| 3:2009cv00220 |
| April 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Jackson Office |
| Hinds |
| Daniel P. Jordan |
| James C. Sumner |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER denying 31 Motion to Intervene; denying 32 Motion to Intervene; denying 33 Motion to Intervene; finding as moot 36 Motion to Strike; finding as moot 37 Motion to request speedy judgment, speedy remedy, and speedy production of plainti ff's land records; finding as moot 48 Motion for Hearing; finding as moot 49 Motion for Protective Order; finding as moot 50 Motion for Order Releasing Plaintiff from Case Management Schedule; finding as moot 55 Motion for Sanctions; fin ding as moot 55 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 56 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 15 Motion to Dismiss; granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 21 Motion to Strike; finding as moot 25 Motion for Hearing; denying [ 27] Motion to Intervene; finding as moot 28 Motion for Judgment on Partial Findings; denying 29 Motion to Intervene; denying 30 Motion to Intervene. A judgment will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on January 15, 2010. (SP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
