Reunion, Inc. et al v. Federal Aviation Administration et al
| Reunion, Inc., Cypress Brake Properties, L.P. and Annandale Investors, L.P |
| Federal Aviation Administration, United States Department of Transportation, United States of America, John Doe One, John Doe Two, Jane Roe One and Jane Roe Two |
| 3:2009cv00269 |
| April 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Jackson Office |
| Hinds |
| Tom S. Lee |
| James C. Sumner |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
(*duplicate) Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 25 MOTION to Dismiss; granting in part, denying in part 23 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on FOIA claim. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 5/3/10 (*this document is identical to #30, which attached only one page of the memorandum opinion and order. Re-docketed to attach entire opinion) (LWE)
|
|
Filing
28
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 7 MOTION to Dismiss Or Alternativly For Summary Judgment; denying 12 motion for partial summary on counts three, four, five, six, seven and eight. Granting in part 25 motion to dismiss, as set forth herein, reserving ruling on that part of this motion to dismiss pertaining to Reunion's FOIA claim. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 3/30/10 (LWE)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
