Caviness v. Ladner
Plaintiff: Carl James Caviness
Defendant: Brian Ladner
Case Number: 3:2009cv00361
Filed: June 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Jackson Office
County: Lauderdale
Presiding Judge: Linda R. Anderson
Presiding Judge: Henry T. Wingate
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 184 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Defendants' [137 & 140] Motions for Summary Judgment are granted, and Plaintiff's 169 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, and Final Judgment in favor of Defendants shall be entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 3/29/2012. (ACF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caviness v. Ladner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carl James Caviness
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Ladner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?