Lee v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) et al
| Rory Thomas Lee |
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) and Illinois Central Railroad Company |
| 3:2010cv00392 |
| July 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Jackson Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Linda R. Anderson |
| Henry T. Wingate |
| Federal Employers Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
225
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 196 Motion in Limine by Amtrak and Illinois Central. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 01/17/2012 (WB)
|
|
Filing
223
ORDER granting 153 Daubert Motion by Amtrak and Illinois Central to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Proffered Expert Maria Klette Ketchum. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 01/11/2012 (WB)
|
|
Filing
211
ORDER granting BFI Waste Services, LLC's 158 Motion for Summary Judgment. BFI's 161 Motion to Exclude Testimony and BFI's 199 Motion in Limine are dismissed as moot. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 12/27/2011 (WB)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER denying Defendant BFI's 63 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Defendant Amtrak's and Defendant Illinois Central's 65 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 05/26/2011 (WB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
