Omobude v. Mississippi Department of Finance and Administration et al
| Frank Omobude |
| Mississippi Department of Finance and Administration, Kevin Upchurch, Clyde Litchfield, Clyde Murrell, John Does 1-5 and Perry Dubard |
| 3:2010cv00703 |
| December 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Jackson Office |
| Hinds |
| F. Keith Ball |
| Tom S. Lee |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 3/5/13 (LWE)
|
|
Filing
27
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting re 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 25 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 4.21.11 (LWE)
|
|
Filing
16
***CORRECTED*** Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 4 MOTION to Dismiss, granting 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment, except as to plaintiff's claim for reinstatement under Section 1983. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 1/28/11 (*re-filed this date to reflect complete spelling of signature of District Judge) (LWE)
|
|
Filing
15
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 4 MOTION to Dismiss, granting 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment, except as to plaintiff's claim for reinstatement under Section 1983. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 1/28/11 (LWE)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
