Branum et al v. Valued Member Credit Union et al
| Jovita Branum, Stephanie Mills, Lindsey Poole, Sheila Raines and Brenda Sones |
| Valued Member Credit Union, Dana Richardson, Ike Rookmaker, Wayne Ellis, Guy Hogan, Sonya Teasley, George Phillips and James Washington |
| 3:2010cv00852 |
| December 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Jackson Office |
| Hinds |
| F. Keith Ball |
| Daniel P. Jordan |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
164
ORDER granting 154 Motion to Seal; granting 154 Motion to Compel; adopting 160 Report and Recommendation of Judge Ball as the finding of this Court for the reasons set out in the order. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on March 26, 2015. (SP)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER granting 109 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 110 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 129 Motion to Strike; finding as moot 131 Motion in Limine for the reasons stated in the order. Because prior discovery in the NCUA case wa s limited to the administrative record, the remaining parties are directed to contact Magistrate Judge Ball with fourteen (14) days of this Order to set up a telephonic conference to determine (1) if Plaintiffs wish to proceed, (2) if additional discovery is necessary, and (3) what deadlines should be set. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on February 27, 2014. (SP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
