Jackson-Hall v. Moss Point School District
| Tonya Jackson-Hall |
| Moss Point School District |
| 3:2011cv00042 |
| January 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Jackson Office |
| Hinds |
| F. Keith Ball |
| Daniel P. Jordan |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion in Limine; granting 51 Motion in Limine; granting 52 Motion in Limine; granting 53 Motion in Limine; denying 54 Motion in Limine; granting 55 Motion in Limine; granting 56 Motion in Limine; denying 57 Motion in Limine; granting 58 Motion in Limine; denying 64 Motion in Limine; denying 26 Motion for Summary Judgment for the reasons set out in the order. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on April 2, 2012. (SP)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting in part 26 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's retaliation claim for the reasons set out in the order. The Court withholds ruling on the remainder of the motion. Plaintiff's retaliation claim is dismissed with pr ejudice. Plaintiff's sexual harassment claim will be heard for oral argument on March 9, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. The parties are relieved of their duty to prepare a proposed pretrial order. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on March 2, 2012. (SP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
