Johnson v. Mississippi Department of Information Technology Services
| Ulessiah O. Johnson |
| Mississippi Department of Information Technology Services |
| 3:2011cv00732 |
| November 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Jackson Office |
| Hinds |
| F. Keith Ball |
| Daniel P. Jordan |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Mississippi Department of Information Technology Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ulessiah O. Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Louis H. Watson, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Robert Nicholas Norris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mississippi Department of Information Technology Services | |
| Represented By: | Malissa Wilson Winfield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
