Wells v. Regions Bank
Plaintiff: Shameka N. Wells
Defendant: Regions Bank
Case Number: 3:2012cv00636
Filed: September 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Jackson Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: Tom S. Lee
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration. Rather than staying proceedings pending arbitration, this cause is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 12/21/12 (LWE)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wells v. Regions Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shameka N. Wells
Represented By: John H. Ott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Regions Bank
Represented By: Emerson Barney Robinson, III
Represented By: Benjamin McRae Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?