Rifenburg Construction, Inc. v. Hatch Mott McDonald, LLC et al
Rifenburg Construction, Inc. |
Hatch Mott McDonald, LLC, Curtis M. Wright and Heath Jenkins |
3:2012cv00813 |
December 4, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Jackson Office |
XX US, Outside State |
F. Keith Ball |
Daniel P. Jordan |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 202 AMENDED ORDER. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on May 19, 2015.(SP) |
Filing 200 ORDER granting 148 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 167 Motion to Strike; finding as moot 176 Motion to Strike; finding as moot 193 Motion to Strike. Rifenburg's claims, as well as the Third-Party Complaint 46 , are dismissed with prejudice for the reasons set out in the order. A judgment will be entered in a separate docket entry to follow. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on May 11, 2015. (SP) |
Filing 40 ORDER denying 30 Motion to Compel; denying 30 Motion to Dismiss; granting 35 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 20 Motion to Dismiss for the reasons stated in the order. Plaintiff is directed to separately file its Second Amended Complaint within seven days of the entry of this Order. The parties are directed to contact the office of Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball within ten days to have the case set for a case management conference. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on September 13, 2013. (SP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.