Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security et al

Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Brenda K. Jackson
Case Number: 3:2013cv00267
Filed: May 3, 2013
Court: Mississippi Southern District Court
Office: Jackson Office
County: Hinds
Referring Judge: F. Keith Ball
Presiding Judge: Carlton W. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 15, 2014 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 16 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Prosecution filed by Commissioner of Social Security, 18 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 10/15/2014. (kf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenda K. Jackson
Represented By: Jas C. Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.