Donnell v. Hartford Central Property Claims Region et al
| Joseph Donnell |
| Hartford Central Property Claims Region, Donan Engineering Co., Inc. and J & S Enterprise of Mississippi, LLC |
| 3:2013cv00761 |
| December 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Northern (Jackson) Office |
| Rankin |
| F. Keith Ball |
| Daniel P. Jordan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER granting 82 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 88 Motion for Summary Judgment to the extent Plaintiff seeks summary judgment as to his claims against Donan for the reasons set out in the order. Plaintiff's claims against Donan Engineering, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on March 29, 2016. (SP)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 83 Motion Extension of Time to File. Plaintiff's Response is due October 1, 2015. If Plaintiff chooses to file a motion for summary judgment, he must do so by October 1, 2015. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on August 10, 2015. (EH)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER denying 19 Motion to Dismiss for the reasons set out in the order. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on June 3, 2015. (SP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
