Johnson v. Mississippi Power Company
Plaintiff: Gralyn D. Johnson
Defendant: Mississippi Power Company
Case Number: 3:2013cv00798
Filed: December 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Northern (Jackson) Office
County: Harrison
Presiding Judge: Tom S. Lee
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 3 MOTION to Dismiss as to retaliation claim, but denying as to all remaining claims. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 3/21/14 (LWE)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Mississippi Power Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mississippi Power Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gralyn D. Johnson
Represented By: Louis H. Watson, Jr.
Represented By: Robert Nicholas Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?