Coleman v. Buscher
Plaintiff: Johnny B. Coleman
Defendant: Warden Buscher
Case Number: 3:2014cv00008
Filed: January 6, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Northern (Jackson) Office
County: Lauderdale
Presiding Judge: Linda R. Anderson
Presiding Judge: Carlton W. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION dismissing this matter without prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). A separate Final Judgment shall be issue pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 4/2/2014. (JS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coleman v. Buscher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Buscher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johnny B. Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?