Taylor et al v. Epps et al
| Kenya Taylor, April Reed, Shenetta Draughn, Linda N. Robinson, Lawonda Jackson, Sibley Christin, Kathryn J. Carter, Angela Peace, Janie Shinnie and Tonya Dawson |
| Christopher Epps, Johnnie Denmark, Andrease Buckner, Kimeiriakis Buck, Travis Crane, Flora Bogan and John Does 1 - 5 |
| 3:2014cv00352 |
| April 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Northern (Jackson) Office |
| Rankin |
| F. Keith Ball |
| Daniel P. Jordan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER granting 95 Motion for Summary Judgment for the reasons set out in the order. All claims against Defendants Fisher, Denmark, Buckner, and Bogan are dismissed. Plaintiffs are directed to contact Courtroom Deputy Shone Powell to schedule a h earing as to damages regarding the default judgments against Kimeiriakis Buck and Travis Crane within thirty (30) days of this Order. Failure to comply will be construed as an abandonment of all claims against Buck and Crane. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on January 15, 2016. (SP)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction for the reasons set out in the order. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on May 18, 2015. (SP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
