Goldsmith v. Strickland et al
Kenneth Ray Goldsmith |
Daniel Strickland, James Rutland, Ben Blaine, Eddie Thompson, Brian Bailey, David King and Pattie Temple |
3:2014cv00626 |
August 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Northern (Jackson) Office |
Rankin |
F. Keith Ball |
Carlton W. Reeves |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion for Summary Judgment. See order for details. Evidentiary hearing regarding exhaustion of certain claims set for 2/22/17 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5D in U.S. Courthouse, Jackson, MS. Deadline of 3/10/17 is set for motion for summary judgment as to certain claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 2/7/17. (YWJ)(Copy mailed to Plaintiff.) |
Filing 53 ORDER granting 48 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 9/29/15. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff at address on docket sheet.) (YWJ) |
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims against Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, are dismissed with prejudice. No separate judgment will be entered at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 8/25/15. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff.) (YWJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.