Laney v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Laney
Defendant: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Case Number: 3:2014cv00825
Filed: October 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Northern (Jackson) Office
County: Rankin
Presiding Judge: Linda R. Anderson
Presiding Judge: Henry T. Wingate
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 17 Report and Recommendations, ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Henry T. Wingate on 5/19/17 (MGB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laney v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Laney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Represented By: Jim Hood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?