Sealey v. Johanson et al
Vincent Sealey |
David R. Johanson, Herbert C. Bruister, Douglas A. Rubel, Jackson Lewis, P.C., All Defendants, Johanson Berenson, L.L.P., Beazley Insurance Company, Inc., Axis Insurance Company, Bruister & Associates Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Bruister & Associates Eligible Individual Account Plan and Bruister & Associates Employee Stock Ownership Trust |
3:2015cv00137 |
February 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Northern (Jackson) Office |
XX US, Outside State |
F. Keith Ball |
Daniel P. Jordan |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1002 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 144 ORDER granting 120 Motion to Dismiss for the reasons set out in the Order. The fraud claim, as well as the requests for disgorgement and a constructive trust, are dismissed. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on January 4, 2017. (SP) |
Filing 89 ORDER denying 34 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 36 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 72 Motion for Access to Court Filings in Any Related Actions for the reasons set out in the order. The parties are instructed to co ntact Magistrate Judge Ball within 10 days of the entry of this Order to set the case for a telephonic case management conference, at which time he will set appropriate deadlines in the case, including a deadline for motions to amend the pleadings. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on March 29, 2016. (SP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.