Dorsey v. Gray et al
| Carol Dorsey |
| Cedrick Gray and Jackson Public School District |
| 3:2015cv00566 |
| August 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Northern (Jackson) Office |
| Hinds |
| F. Keith Ball |
| Daniel P. Jordan |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER re 68 Motion for Summary Judgment: The parties are given 14 days from the date of this Order to file simultaneous supplemental briefs addressing only the issues identified in this Order. No additional briefing will be permitted absent further order of the Court. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on November 29, 2017. (SP)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER denying 66 Motion to Extend Deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 7/12/17 (RBM)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 31 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons stated in the order, Defendants' Motion is granted, and the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a motion to amend, attaching a proposed amended complaint, within ten days of the entry of this order. Failure to so move within the time allowed will result in the entry of final judgment in favor of Defendants. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on September 6, 2016. (DI)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
