Marcoon v. Rankin County Circuit Court and Jail et al
| Walter Don Marcoon |
| Rankin County Circuit Court and Jail, Rebecca Boyd, Bryan Bailey and James Rutland |
| 3:2015cv00662 |
| September 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Northern (Jackson) Office |
| Rankin |
| F. Keith Ball |
| Daniel P. Jordan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER denying 39 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 45 Report and Recommendations for the reasons set out in the Order. Judge Ball is directed to set the matter for an Omnibus Hearing. Because this denial is without prejudice, Defendants are not precluded from moving for summary judgment in the future, if appropriate. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on January 3, 2017.(SP)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL: For the reasons set out in the Order, Defendants Rankin County Circuit Court and Kent McDaniel are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to judicial immunity. Defendant Rankin County Jail is dismissed without prejudice. The claims against Defendant Rebecca Boyd are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to quasi-judicial immunity and as frivolous. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The remainder of this case shall proceed. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on April 20, 2016.(SP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
