Davis v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
Plaintiff: Chakakhan R. Davis
Defendant: Hinds County, Mississippi, Tyrone Lewis, Jerry Arinder, Brenda Jones and Johnny Jenkins
Case Number: 3:2015cv00874
Filed: December 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Northern (Jackson) Office
County: Hinds
Presiding Judge: Linda R. Anderson
Presiding Judge: Carlton W. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER denying 103 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 10/25/2017. Copy mailed to plaintiff at address listed on docket sheet. (AC)
September 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER denying 74 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 88 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 9/22/2017. Copy mailed to plaintiff at address listed on docket sheet. (AC)
March 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER denying 85 Motion for Recusal. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 3/29/2017. Copy mailed to plaintiff at address listed on docket sheet. (AC)
May 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER granting 26 Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims; granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Dismiss Federal Claims. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 5/23/2016. Copy of Order mailed to plaintiff at address listed on docket sheet. (AC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chakakhan R. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hinds County, Mississippi
Represented By: William Robert Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyrone Lewis
Represented By: William Robert Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry Arinder
Represented By: William Robert Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brenda Jones
Represented By: William Robert Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnny Jenkins
Represented By: William Robert Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?