Moore v. Bryant
Plaintiff: Carlos E. Moore
Defendant: Dewey Phillip Bryant
Case Number: 3:2016cv00151
Filed: February 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Northern (Jackson) Office
County: Grenada
Presiding Judge: F. Keith Ball
Presiding Judge: Carlton W. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dismissing case; denying 26 Motion to Amend. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 9/8/2016. (AC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos E. Moore
Represented By: Tameika L. Bennett
Represented By: Carlos E. Moore
Represented By: Justin D. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dewey Phillip Bryant
Represented By: Douglas T. Miracle (State Gov)
Represented By: Harold Edward Pizzetta, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?