Brown v. Hood et al
| Leonard Brown |
| Jim Hood, Marshal Turner, Jacquelyn Banks, Unknown Lucker, Mark Davis, Unknown Keys, Unknown Johnson and John Does 1-10 |
| 3:2017cv00050 |
| January 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Northern (Jackson) Office |
| Hinds |
| F. Keith Ball |
| Daniel P. Jordan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 82 Motion for Summary Judgment as set out in the Order. Brown is instructed to show cause within ten days why his claim against Defendant Captain Johnson should not be dismissed. The parties are directed to contact the magistrate judge to set this matter for a settlement conference. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on October 29, 2019. (SP)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 49 Motion to Dismiss for the reasons set out in the Order. But Brown may file a motion to amend within 10 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on July 25, 2018. (SP)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion to Dismiss for the reasons set out in the Order. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on January 31, 2018. (SP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
