Ruiz v. Shults
Plaintiff: Eric Ruiz
Defendant: L. Shults
Case Number: 3:2018cv00043
Filed: January 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Northern (Jackson) Office
County: Yazoo
Presiding Judge: Linda R. Anderson
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 13 Report and Recommendations. IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, Petitioner EricRuizs Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 1/29/2021 (PG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruiz v. Shults
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Ruiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. Shults
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?