West v. Mahindra Motors of North American, Inc. et al
Lane West |
Mitsubishi Mahindra Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd, Jolly-Lewis Enterprises, Inc., Mahindra Motors of North American, Inc., Mahindra USA, Inc. and The Tractor Store, Inc. |
3:2018cv00496 |
July 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Northern (Jackson) Office |
Smith |
F Keith Ball |
Daniel P Jordan |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ATTACHMENT (Certificate of Service) re #1 Notice of Removal, by Mahindra USA, Inc. (PKM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mahindra USA, Inc. from Circuit Court of Smith County, Mississippi, case number 2018-053-2. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-3768327) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(PKM) Modified on 7/27/2018 (PKM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.