Ferraez v. Shelter General Insurance Company et al
| Jace L.C. Ferraez |
| Corey May, Shelter General Insurance Company and John Does 1-5 |
| 3:2018cv00631 |
| September 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| William H Barbour |
| John C Gargiulo |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #8 : Incorrect linkage made. [REPLY to Response to Motion ] should be linked to [MOTION to Strike 2 Answer to Complaint and Shelter's Affirmative Defenses ]. All related filings to motions (using the "Responses and Replies" category, with the exception of "Response to Order") should be linked back to the original motion. Court staff has made the correction. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(2) requires that all supporting exhibits to a document be denominated by an exhibit letter or number and a meaningful description. Attorney is advised to follow this rule in future filings. (LAT) |
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 Response in Opposition to Motion re #3 MOTION to Strike #2 Answer to Complaint and Shelter's Affirmative Defenses filed by Jace L.C. Ferraez (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Ferraez, Cory) Modified on 11/6/2018 (LAT). |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to MOTION to Strike Answer to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses. Reply due on or before 11/5/2018. Signed by District Judge William H. Barbour, Jr., on 10/29/2018. NO WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW. (sc)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Jace L.C. Ferraez (Ferraez, Cory) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Strike #2 Answer to Complaint and Shelter's Affirmative Defenses filed by Shelter General Insurance Company (Dillon, Eric) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Additional Time. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike #3 is due 10/21/18. The discovery served upon Defendant with the Complaint is deemed as served on the date of the case management conference, such that Defendant's response will be due 30 days after the case management conference. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 10/2/18 (HM)
|
| Filing 5 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Shelter General Insurance Company (Dillon, Eric) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in Support re #3 MOTION to Strike #2 Answer to Complaint and Shelter's Affirmative Defenses filed by Jace L.C. Ferraez (Ferraez, Cory) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Strike #2 Answer to Complaint and Shelter's Affirmative Defenses by Jace L.C. Ferraez (Ferraez, Cory) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Shelter General Insurance Company.(Dillon, Eric) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Shelter General Insurance Company from Circuit Court of Hinds County, MS, case number 18-395. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-3806049) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
