Stingley v. Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram et al
Dale Michele Stingley |
Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram and Mac Haik Enterprises |
3:2018cv00656 |
September 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Daniel P Jordan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of Service of Rule 26 Pre-Discovery Disclosure by Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram, Mac Haik Enterprises (Heidelberg, Cecil) |
Filing 15 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE UPON CONSENT. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball for all further proceedings. Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 11/01/18 (KNS) |
Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram, Mac Haik Enterprises. (PKM) |
Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Dale Michele Stingley. (PKM) |
Filing 12 NOTICE CONSENT AND REFERENCE OF CIVIL ACTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram, Mac Haik Enterprises (Heidelberg, Cecil) |
Filing 11 NOTICE - NOTICE OF CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE(Signed by Plaintiff only) by Dale Michele Stingley. (Copy of blank consent forms with letter mailed to Defendants' attorney, Cecil Maison Heidelberg.) (PKM) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Mac Haik Enterprises.(Heidelberg, Cecil) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram.(Heidelberg, Cecil) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John Kevin Watson on behalf of Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram, Mac Haik Enterprises (Watson, John) |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Dale Michele Stingley as to Mac Haik Enterprises served on 10/4/2018, answer due 10/24/2018. (PKM) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Dale Michele Stingley as to Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram served on 10/4/2018, answer due 10/24/2018. (PKM) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. That Donald W. Gould and C. Keith Lea be admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of the defendants in association with local counsel and upon registration for electronic filing as required by the Court. No further written order shall issue from the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 10/12/2018. (JEJ) |
Filing 5 MOTION for C. Keith Lea to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number 0538-3829132) by Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram, Mac Haik Enterprises (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Certificate of Good Standing)(Heidelberg, Cecil) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Donald W. Gould to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number 0538-3829127) by Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram, Mac Haik Enterprises (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Certificate of Good Standing)(Heidelberg, Cecil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Cecil Maison Heidelberg on behalf of Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram, Mac Haik Enterprises (Heidelberg, Cecil) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram, Mac Haik Enterprises. (KNS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, WITH JURY DEMAND, against Mac Haik Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram, Mac Haik Enterprises ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 34643051890), filed by Dale Michele Stingley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(PKM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.