Iapalucci v. Phelan et al
Anna Iapalucci |
John Doe 1-20, Vicksburg Healthcare, LLC, LA-MS Foot Clinic, LLC and James T. Phelan |
3:2018cv00749 |
October 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Linda R Anderson |
Carlton W Reeves |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #10 Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE ON THIS MOTION. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 12/10/2018. (DJ) |
Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF Receipt filed as to #9 Letter to Hon. Jan Hyland Daigre, Circuit Clerk of Warren County, Mississippi, transmitting certified copies of Order to Remand and docket sheet. (VM) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs by Anna Iapalucci (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Tracie Herring, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Frank Vollor, #3 Exhibit C - Itemized Statement of Services)(Herring, Tracie) |
Filing 9 Letter to Hon. Jan Hyland Daigre, Circuit Clerk of Warren County, Mississippi, transmitting certified copies of Order to Remand and docket sheet; (VM) |
Filing 8 ORDER OF REMAND granting #2 Motion to Remand; granting #2 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 11/16/18 (VM) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by LA-MS Foot Clinic, LLC.(Garrard, Nicholas) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by James T. Phelan.(Pumphrey, Diane) |
Filing 5 ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 10/31/2018 (WG) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #3: ***DISREGARD THIS ENTRY*** Incorrect PDF attached. Correct Order will be docketed. (WG) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #3 : Incorrect document attached. Corrected document will be refiled. (VM) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Withdraw #1 Notice of Removal,,, by James T. Phelan (Pumphrey, Diane) |
Filing 3 **ERROR** Disregard this entry. ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY pending a ruling on the Motion to Remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 10/31/2018. (WG) Modified on 11/2/2018 (VM). |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #2 : This document requests several motion reliefs. Every motion relief should be selected from the list of motion titles or each relief docketed separately. The same PDF document may be used for all motion filing entries. It is not necessary to refile as court staff has made the necessary correction. Attorney is advised to follow this procedure in future filings. (KNS) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Remand and MOTION for Attorney's Fees by Anna Iapalucci (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Defendant Phelan's Notice of Removal)(Herring, Tracie). Added MOTION for Attorney Fees on 10/31/2018 (KNS). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by James T. Phelan from Circuit Court of Warren County, Mississippi, case number 18,86-CI. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0538-3842992) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Second Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Lower Court Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.