Lassiter v. Martin
Plaintiff: Michael Lassiter
Defendant: Warden Mark Martin
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 3:2018cv00849
Filed: December 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: F Keith Ball
Referring Judge: Daniel P Jordan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2019 Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT. IT IS, HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this habeas corpus case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 1/18/2019 (VM)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pro se Petitioner Michael Lassiter's Petition #1 for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 1/18/2019 (VM)
January 16, 2019 Filing 6 Response to Order re #5 ORDER, on or before January 23, 2019, Petitioner shall file a written response consistent with this Order, filed by Michael Lassiter. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM)
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER, on or before January 23, 2019, Petitioner shall file a written response consistent with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 1/2/19. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR)
December 28, 2018 Filing 4 ATTACHMENT to #2 Memorandum in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in response to #3 Order, filed by Michael Lassiter. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Envelope)(VM)
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER, the Clerk of Court shall mail to the Petitioner a copy of page one of his Memorandum in Support #2 . Petitioner is directed to place his signature on the document and return it to this Court no later than January 2, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 12/12/18. [Copy of Order and page one of Memorandum #2 mailed to petitioner] (LDR)
December 10, 2018 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Lassiter (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cwl)
December 10, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 34643052923.), filed by Michael Lassiter. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(cwl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/10/2018: #3 Notice of Assignment) (cwl). Modified on 12/10/2018 . Copy of NEF and notice of assignment mailed to plaintiff.(cwl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lassiter v. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden Mark Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Lassiter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?