Headden v. Rivers
Petitioner: Ryan Edwin Headden
Respondent: C. Rivers
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 3:2019cv00121
Filed: February 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: F Keith Ball
Referring Judge: Daniel P Jordan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER, Respondent Warden C. Rivers shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this case within 20 days of the service of a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 04/11/2019. [Copy of Order mailed to Petitioner] (CS)
April 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Response to Order re #5 ORDER, Petitioner shall complete the attached Petition and file it with the Court no later than April 9, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 03/26/2019. [Copy of Order and attached form mailed to Petitioner] (Attachments: #1 AO 242 Form) (CS) filed by Ryan Edwin Headden (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT)
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER, Petitioner shall complete the attached Petition and file it with the Court no later than April 9, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 03/26/2019. [Copy of Order and attached form mailed to Petitioner] (Attachments: #1 AO 242 Form) (CS)
March 25, 2019 Writ of Habeas Corpus Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 34643054172. (LAT)
March 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as set out in the Order. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on March 12, 2019. (SP)
February 25, 2019 Filing 3 Mail returned as Undeliverable, NEF re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus-Motion for Award of Good Time Under 28 U.S.C., NEF re #2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and notice of assignment. Mail sent to Ryan Edwin Headden. (LAT)
February 14, 2019 Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ryan Edwin Headden. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT)
February 14, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus-Motion for Award of Good Time Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 , filed by Ryan Edwin Headden. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(NEFs and notice of assignment mailed to Petitioner's most current address.)(LAT) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/14/2019: #3 Notice of Assignment) (LAT). Modified on 2/14/2019 (LAT).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Headden v. Rivers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ryan Edwin Headden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: C. Rivers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?