Lawson v. Federated Service Insurance Company et al
Corwin Lawson |
GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company and Federated Service Insurance Company |
3:2019cv00212 |
March 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Tom S Lee |
Robert H Walker |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company (Wilson, Malissa) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company (Wilson, Malissa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Federated Service Insurance Company, GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company from Circuit - Madison, case number 2019-0052-SSR. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-3953285) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit C - Certified Copy of State Court Record, #3 Civil Cover Sheet reflects Exhibt B)(cwl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.