Curry v. Nash
Ricky Curry |
Warden C. Nash |
Pro Se Department |
3:2019cv00349 |
May 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Tom S Lee |
Robert H Walker |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by C. Nash (Perez-Federal Gov, Marc) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Attorney General of U.S. served on 5/29/2019, answer due 6/18/2019. (VM) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to C. Nash served on 5/28/2019, answer due 6/17/2019. (VM) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Civil Process Clerk served on 5/24/2019, answer due 6/13/2019. (VM) |
|
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ricky Curry. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1 - Order, #4 Exhibit 2 - Report, #5 Exhibit 3 - Regional Appeal, #6 Exhibit 4 - Regional Denial, #7 Exhibit 5 - Central Appeal, #8 Exhibit 6 - Adminstrative Denial, #9 Exhibit 7 - Clinical Encounter, #10 Exhibit 8 - BP-9 Complaint)(VM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5 receipt number 34643054911), filed by Ricky Curry. (Attachments: #1 Curry Cover Letter, #2 Curry Envelope, #3 Woodley Cover Letter, #4 Woodley Envelope, #5 Notice of Assignment)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.