Divine v. Mississippi
Abraham Divine |
Mississippi |
Pro Se Department |
3:2019cv00418 |
June 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Daniel P Jordan |
Robert H Walker |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Rehearing in re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Abraham Divine. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ND) |
Filing 5 USCA ORDER denying Motion to file successive petition filed by Movant Mr. Abraham Divine. (Attachments: #1 USCA Cover Letter)(ND) |
Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING PETITION - IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Petition #1 for habeas corpus relief be, and the same hereby is, TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case pending the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 7/2/2019 (ND) |
Filing 3 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Abraham Divine. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ND) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Abraham Divine. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ND) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Abraham Divine. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(ND) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.