Rush v. Webster County Department of Human Services Snap Division et al
| Zori N. Rush and Zorri N. Rush |
| Annie Patterson, Ann Hitt and Webster County Department of Human Services Snap Division |
| 3:2019cv00429 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Carlton W Reeves |
| P.I.: Other |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend/Correct per #4 Order by Zorri N. Rush. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM) |
Filing 4
ORDER. The Clerk of Court is instructed to docket this Order and the Motion to Amend in Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-429. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 6/24/2019 (VM)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Copy mailed to plaintiff at address listed on docket sheet. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 6/25/2019. (AC)
|
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Zorri N. Rush. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM) Modified on 6/21/2019 to correct name (VM). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Webster County Department of Human Services Snap Division, Ann Hitt, Annie Patterson, filed by Zorri N. Rush. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(VM) Modified on 6/21/2019 to correct name(VM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
