Johnson v. M.D.O.C.
Fredrick Lee Johnson |
M.D.O.C. |
Pro Se Department |
3:2019cv00566 |
August 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Carlton W Reeves |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, Petitioner on or before October 23, 2019, respond to this Order to Show Cause in writing and explain this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court's Order #4 . Show Cause Response due by 10/23/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 10/1/2019. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR) |
Filing 4 ORDER, Petitioner on or before September 13, 2019, shall file a written response consistent with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 8/15/2019. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR) |
Filing 3 ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 8/15/2019. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR) |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Fredrick Lee Johnson (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(PKM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Fredrick Lee Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(PKM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.