Tate v. Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
| Michael Tate |
| Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company and John and Jane Does 1,2,3,4, and 5 |
| 3:2019cv00593 |
| August 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Defendant Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint) by Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company.(Hill, William) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company from Circuit Court of Madison County, MS, case number CI-2019-0181. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-4068209) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Certified and Complete State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
