Clayton v. Mason
Plaintiff: Chester Clayton
Defendant: Sheriff Victor Mason
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 3:2019cv00629
Filed: September 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Linda R Anderson
Referring Judge: Carlton W Reeves
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Victor Mason (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Order Binding Defendant to Await Action of the Grand Jury and Setting Bond/Setting Bail, Hinds County Court #16-cr-1143), #2 Exhibit B (Indictment, Hinds County Circuit Court Cause No. 17-cr-770-WLK), #3 Exhibit C (Docket, Hinds County Circuit Court Cause No. 17-cr-770-WLK), #4 Exhibit D (Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Due Process), #5 Exhibit E (10.24.17 Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date), #6 Exhibit F (7.9.18 Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date), #7 Exhibit G (1.3.19 Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date), #8 Exhibit H (6.7.19 Agreed Order of Continuance), #9 Exhibit I (6.28.19 Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date), #10 Exhibit J (10.3.19 Agreed Order of Continuance), #11 Exhibit K (10.8.19 Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date))(Rutherford-State Gov, Erin)
October 7, 2019 Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Jim Hood, bearing Article No.: 7018 0360 0000 2195 0930, served on 10/4/2019, answer due 10/24/2019. (VM)
October 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER, Respondent Mason, through Jim Hood, shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within twenty (20) days of the service upon the said Jim Hood of a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 10/03/2019. [Copy of Order mailed to Petitioner] (CS)
October 2, 2019 Filing fee: $5, receipt number 34643056665. (VM)
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER, on or before October 4, 2019, petitioner shall complete and file the attached application or pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 9/4/2019. [Copy mailed to plaintiff] (LDR)
September 3, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Chester Clayton. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Assignment, #2 Envelope)(VM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clayton v. Mason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chester Clayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff Victor Mason
Represented By: Jim Hood-State Gov
Represented By: Erin E Rutherford-State Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?