Campbell v. State of Mississippi
| Onorious Campbell |
| State of Mississippi |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2019cv00712 |
| October 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Robert H Walker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter from Onorious Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ND) |
| Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF ACCOUNT INFORMATION AND CERTIFICATE filed by Onorious Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ND) |
Filing 5
ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as set out in the Order. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on November 13, 2019. (SP)
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Onorious Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ND) |
| Filing 3 ATTACHMENTS to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Onorious Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Lauderdale County Doc., #2 Envelope)(ND) |
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Onorious Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ND) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Onorious Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(ND) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
