Smith v. Rivers
Petitioner: Johnnell A Smith
Respondent: C. Rivers
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 3:2019cv00750
Filed: October 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: F Keith Ball
Referring Judge: Carlton W Reeves
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER, Respondent Warden C. Rivers shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this case within 20 days of the service of a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 12/19/2019. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR)
December 16, 2019 Writ of Habeas Corpus Filing fee PAID: $ 5.00, receipt number 34643057635. (LAT)
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Response to Order re #4 ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 11/8/2019. Copy mailed to petitioner at address listed on docket sheet. (AC) filed by Johnnell A Smith (Attachments: #1 Supplement - Request for Withdrawal of Inmate's Personal Funds, #2 Envelope)(LAT)
November 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 11/8/2019. Copy mailed to petitioner at address listed on docket sheet. (AC)
November 7, 2019 Filing 3 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Johnnell A Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT)
October 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER, on or before November 22, 2019, Petitioner shall complete and file the attached application OR pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 10/23/2019. [Copy of Order and application mailed to Petitioner] (CS)
October 22, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Johnnell A Smith. (Attachments: #1 Attachment -Receipt of Administrative Remedy, #2 Exhibit 1- Incident Report dated 10/29/2017, #3 Exhibit 2- Inmate Rights at Discipline Hearing, #4 Exhibit 3- Notice of Discipline Hearing Before the (DHO), #5 Attachment - Incident Report dated 10/29/2017, #6 Attachment - Discipline Hearing Officer Report dated 11/22/2017, #7 Attachment - Central Office Administrative Remedy Appeal, #8 Envelope, #9 Notice of Assignment)(NEF and notice of assignment mailed to Petitioner's current address listed on docket sheet via USPS regular mail.)(LAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Rivers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Johnnell A Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: C. Rivers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?