Ramirez v. United States of America
| Vincent Anthony Ramirez |
| United States of America |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2019cv00785 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Carlton W Reeves |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, on or before January 3, 2020, Petitioner shall file a written response showing cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with a Court Order #2 . Show Cause Response due by 1/3/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 12/17/2019. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER, on or before December 5, 2019, Ramirez shall complete, sign and file a form Petition For A Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Form AO-242). Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 11/5/2019. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (Attachments: #1 AO 242 Form 2241 Petition)(LDR)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 34643057100.), filed by Vincent Anthony Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(NEF and notice of assignment mailed to Petitioner's current address via USPS regular mail.)(LAT) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/4/2019) (LAT). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
