Jackson Holdings, LLC v. D.W. Gold Construction, Inc. et al
Jackson Holdings, LLC |
D.W. Gold Construction, Inc., Door 2 Door, LLC, David Goldstein and HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LTD |
3:2019cv00790 |
November 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Carlton W Reeves |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice As To All Defendants by Jackson Holdings, LLC (Kahane, S.) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jackson Holdings, LLC. D.W. Gold Construction, Inc. served on 11/13/2019, answer due 12/4/2019. (Kahane, S.) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jackson Holdings, LLC. David Goldstein served on 11/13/2019, answer due 12/4/2019. (Kahane, S.) |
Filing 9 NOTICE Regarding Service of Summons and Complaint on Defendants by Jackson Holdings, LLC re Order (Kahane, S.) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jackson Holdings, LLC. HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LTD served on 11/12/2019, answer due 12/3/2019. (Kahane, S.) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jackson Holdings, LLC. Door 2 Door, LLC served on 11/11/2019, answer due 12/2/2019. (Kahane, S.) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Jackson Holdings, LLC (Attachments: #1 Affidavit / Declaration of Moshe Weber)(Kahane, S.) |
Filing 5 ***ERROR***DISREGARD THIS ENTRY. NOTICE of Filing Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Jackson Holdings, LLC re #4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Moshe Weber in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Injunction and Preliminary Injunction)(Kahane, S.) Modified on 11/8/2019 (cwl). |
Filing 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Jackson Holdings, LLC (Kahane, S.). Added MOTION for Preliminary Injunction on 11/8/2019 (cwl). |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #5 : Incorrect event chosen. Attorney directed to refile as Memorandum in Support of Motion. (cwl) Modified on 11/8/2019 (cwl). |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER. On or before Monday, November 11, 2019, the plaintiff shall file returns showing that the defendants have been served with copies of the summons and complaint. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 11/8/2019. (AC) |
Filing 3 ORDER re Supplemental Briefing. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 11/6/2019. (AC) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to D.W. Gold Construction, Inc., Door 2 Door, LLC, David Goldstein, HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LTD. (LAT) |
Filing 1 Verified COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment, Breach of Contract, Quantum Meruit and/or Unjust Enrichment, Misrepresentation, Fraud, Fraudulent Inducement, Slander of Title, and for Injunctive Relief, and Damages against D.W. Gold Construction, Inc., Door 2 Door, LLC, David Goldstein, HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, LTD ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-4121087), filed by Jackson Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Job Proposal, #2 Exhibit B- Construction Contract, #3 Exhibit C- Subcontractors' Liens, #4 Exhibit D- D.W. Gold Construction, Inc.'s Mechanic's Lien, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT) Modified on 11/5/2019 (LAT). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.