Gates v. YUM! Brands, Inc. et al
Jemuel Gates |
YUM! Brands, Inc., JJB Pizza, LLC and Standard Enterprises |
3:2019cv00830 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Daniel P Jordan |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Dismiss for the reasons stated in the Order. The claims against JJB Pizza are dismissed. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on January 7, 2020. (SP) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Support re #15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by YUM! Brands, Inc. (Strong, Jason) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment by YUM! Brands, Inc. (Strong, Jason) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Ryan Burns on behalf of Jemuel Gates (Burns, Christopher) |
Filing 13 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/23/2020 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (JEJ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura W. Givens on behalf of JJB Pizza, LLC (Givens, Laura) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by JJB Pizza, LLC (Riddick, Roger) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by JJB Pizza, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- Answer)(Riddick, Roger) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) and Affirmative Defenses by Standard Enterprises (Smith, Thomas) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Edwin S. Gault, Jr on behalf of Standard Enterprises (Gault, Edwin) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by JJB Pizza, LLC.(Riddick, Roger) |
Filing 6 Joinder in Document by JJB Pizza, LLC (Riddick, Roger) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #3 : Attorney is advised to include the judge assignment (DPJ-FKB) on future filed pleadings. (LAT) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by YUM! Brands, Inc. (Strong, Jason) |
Filing 4 Joinder in Document by YUM! Brands, Inc. to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Standard Enterprises, #2 Amended Document filed by Standard Enterprises (Strong, Jason) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Standard Enterprises (Smith, Thomas) |
Filing 2 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Standard Enterprises. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal (Smith, Thomas) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # [1-5] Civil Cover Sheet attached. (cwl) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Standard Enterprises from Circuit - Hinds, case number 19-439. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-4141341) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A SEI Summons, #2 Exhibit B Verdicts, #3 Exhibit C Consent Email, #4 Exhibit D Certified Copy of State Court Record)(cwl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/18/2019: #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (cwl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.