Williams v. National Express Transit Corporation
Marchella Williams |
National Express Transit Corporation |
3:2019cv00857 |
November 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Carlton W Reeves |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RESET Hearing: Telephonic Case Management Conference reset for 2/18/2020 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (JEJ) |
Filing 5 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 2/13/2020 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (JEJ) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by National Express Transit Corporation.(Lindsay, Timothy) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting Unopposed Motion #3 for Extension of Time to Answer. National Express Transit Corporation answer due 12/13/2019. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 12/2/2019. (dcw) |
Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal,, by National Express Transit Corporation (Lindsay, Timothy) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by National Express Transit Corporation (Lindsay, Timothy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by National Express Transit Corporation from Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, case number 19-716. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 34643057336) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. National Express Transit Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: National Express Transit Corporation | |
Represented By: | Timothy W. Lindsay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marchella Williams | |
Represented By: | S. Craig Panter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.