Brunet v. John Doe
Julio-Armando Brunet, Mandy Brunet and Julio Armando Brunet |
John Doe |
Pro Se Department |
3:2019cv00879 |
December 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Daniel P Jordan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, on or before February 4, 2020, pro se Petitioner Julio-Armando Brunet, shall either pay the $5.00 filing fee, amend his application to proceed ifp, or file a written response showing cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to obey an Order #4 of the Court. Show Cause Response due by 2/4/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 01/21/2020. [Copy of Order mailed to Petitioner] (CS) |
Filing 4 ORDER, on or before January 3, 2020, petitioner shall complete and file the attached application or pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 12/4/2019. [Copy mailed to plaintiff] (LDR) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Trust Receipt by Julio-Armando Brunet. (Attachments: #1 Indemnity Bond, #2 Envelope)(VM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE re Plaintiff unable to pay filing fee by Julio-Armando Brunet. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Envelope)(VM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Julio-Armando Brunet. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Assignment)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.