Xiong v. Paul
Petitioner: Pao Hue Yeng Xiong
Respondent: David Paul
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 3:2019cv00942
Filed: December 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Tom S Lee
Referring Judge: Robert H Walker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. David Paul answer due 3/30/2020. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on February 20, 2020. (Joffe, Scherry)
February 19, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by David Paul (Paige-Federal Gov, Mitzi)
February 19, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER finding as moot #10 Motion to Extend Deadline to pay filing fee. The docket indicates the filing fee was paid on 2/4/2020, receipt number 34643058272. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on February 19, 2020. (Joffe, Scherry)
February 18, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Deadline to pay Filing Fee, filed by Pao Hue Yeng Xiong. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ND)
February 18, 2020 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Attorney General served on 2/11/2020, answer due 3/2/2020. (ND)
February 12, 2020 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Warden served on 2/7/2020, answer due 2/27/2020. (ND)
February 10, 2020 Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Civil Process Clerk served on 2/7/2020, answer due 2/27/2020. (ND)
February 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER, Respondent Warden shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within 20 days of the service of a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 02/05/2020. [Copy of Order mailed to Petitioner] (CS)
February 4, 2020 Filing fee PAID: $ 5.00, receipt number 34643058272. (ND)
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER, on or before February 5, 2020, Petitioner shall complete and file the attached application OR pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 01/06/2020. [Copy of Order mailed to Petitioner] (CS)
December 31, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE on Filing Supporting Exhibit on Page IX of December Filed Habeas Corpus Petition Concerning Incident Report #2951655 by Pao Hue Yeng Xiong. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT) (Main Document 4 replaced on 12/31/2019) (LAT).
December 30, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE to Instant Court that Exhibits Intended to be in Support of both Instant Petition and Notice on Administrative Exhaustion and Applicability of Administrative Exhaustion Doctrine on Instant Petition by Pao Hue Yeng Xiong (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT)
December 30, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE on Administrative Exhaustion and Applicability of Administrative Exhaustion Doctrine on Instant Petition by Pao Hue Yeng Xiong. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit A, #32 Exhibit B, #33 Exhibit C, #34 Exhibit D, #35 Exhibit E, #36 Exhibit F, #37 Exhibit G, #38 Exhibit H, #39 Exhibit I, #40 Exhibit J, #41 Exhibit K, #42 Envelope)(LAT)
December 30, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus regarding Incident Report #2951655, filed by Pao Hue Yeng Xiong. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit A, #32 Exhibit B, #33 Exhibit C, #34 Exhibit D, #35 Exhibit E, #36 Exhibit F, #37 Exhibit G, #38 Exhibit H, #39 Exhibit I, #40 Exhibit J, #41 Exhibit K, #42 Envelope, #43 Notice of Assignment)(LAT) Modified on 12/31/2019 (LAT).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Xiong v. Paul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Paul
Represented By: Mitzi Dease Paige-Federal Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Pao Hue Yeng Xiong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?